
In preparation for what is likely to be the best movie of the summer, I thought we’d discuss a little Star Trek. Doesn’t that sound like fun?
It seems to me that Star Trek is the most absolutely divisive form of geek pop culture entertainment ever, if that makes any sense at all. It is the definition of dorky. People are willing to give a pass to anything, and accept the quirks of most any random geeky thing. For example, no one really hates Star Wars (or am I just being optimistic?). Even if you don’t necessarily care for the goings on in our favorite galaxy far, far away, your mouth doesn’t fill with bile at the very mention of its name.
Not poor Star Trek. People HATE Star Trek. It’s not cool. It’s never been cool. It was the original, weirdo, outcast, fan convention-y, dork show by which all others are based and it has never escaped that stigma. For some reason, people find it absolutely impossible to accept that there is such a thing as a causal Star Trek fan. When I say, “Oh, that new Star Trek movie. That looks good. I think I’ll go see that,” people are like, “OMFG, are you some sort of weirdo looser dork? Are you lining up at midnight? Are you going to dress up? Do you speak Klingon? Have you gotten laid? Were they wearing Vulcan ears when you did it? Or was it just a Vulcan blow up doll? Why are you such a fucking dork, you dorky fuck?” This is what people say.
I consider myself… wait for it… a causal Star Trek fan. Such a thing exists. It is possible. Now, people know I am a dork and just assume that I am head over heels in love with Gene Roddenberry’s vision of life in the 23rd century. I admit that it would be an accurate assumption to make. But let me just make one thing ABSOLUTELY clear before we get any further into our discussion: Star Trek and Star Wars are two absolutely, completely distinct and separate things. While there is a ton of overlap, liking one does not mean you will like the other, and they are in fact two COMPLETELY different approaches to COMPLETELY different stories. I am a huge and unapologetic Star Wars enthusiast. I love the hell out of that stupid thing. If you want to make fun of me for something, make fun of me for that. I have a Yoda poster and a Han Solo painting both hanging in my apartment. I DO NOT have a Star Trek anything hanging anywhere in my apartment. So there.
…
No, I’m not done with that yet, I’ve decided. I mean, it’s like saying Nintendo and Sega are the same thing. I mean, Christ! I once read something a long time ago that said Star Wars was the ultimate Republican view of the future (even though it takes place a long time ago, bitches) and Star Trek was the Democratic view. I can kinda see that. Star Wars is about a huge bureaucracy that fails and requires a small revolution to overthrow and install a, theoretically, smaller government body. Star Trek is about a quasi-utopian federation that completely rules all the star systems. They don’t even have money! So there. Star Wars and Star Trek are as completely incompatible as Republicans and Democrats. I trust I’ve proven my point.
So, I consider myself a casual Star Trek fan. I’ve watched some of the TV episodes. I’ve seen all of the movies multiple times. I know the difference between a Vulcan and a Romulan. But I have not seen every episode. Hell, I haven’t even seen complete episodes of Deep Space Nine and Enterprise. I have never read one of the books. I do not speak Klingon. I have never had a sexual fantasy involving any of the characters. I like to keep things casual.
I think the reason I’m not more of a Star Trek fan is that there is simply too much crap to keep up with. I mean, we are talking about six television series, hundreds of books and comics, ten (soon to be eleven) movies, and so on. I mean, who seriously has time to sort through all that? And a lot of it is not all that good. Star Trek is primarily a series of TV, um, series, and a lot of the episodes I’ve were pretty terrible. Not just from the original series but from the recent ones, like The Next Generation, as well.
My admiration of Star Trek comes primarily from the movies. Instead of watching 100+ hours of a TV show with bad special effects, all the good stuff about Star Trek is boiled down to just under two hours in a movie with slightly better effects. I actually like all the movies for different reasons, but the quality on those things are absolutely all over the place. Some are awesome and some are considered the worst movies ever made. The general rule of thumb is that the even numbered Treks are the ones worth watching, and anything with an odd number should be thrown in the garbage. This rule actually holds up really well, except part VII (Generations), which is one of my personal favorites.
So just a quick go over of the movies since you care (and really, it’s my blog so I can do this). Part One, The Motion Picture, is pretty freaking boring. Wrath of Khan is pretty freaking good. The Search for Spock is alright. The Voyage Home is the one with the whales and really funny. The Final Frontier is not as bad as everyone makes it out to be. The Undiscovered Country is my favorite. Generations is cool cause it has The Next Generation cast, finally. First Contact is fantastic. Insurrection is the worst of the worst. Nemesis ain’t much better. It’s a shame that the movies with The Next Generation cast aren’t better, since I like that show better than the original, as I think most people my age do since it was the series airing when we were growing up. I mean, come on, Worf and Data and Jordi LaForge/Reading Rainbow guy? And Captain Picard? They are cool.
So I think the new movie looks really fun. There’s already a big stink about it cause it changes a lot of the timeline and isn’t completely true to the original series. But, you see, that’s the point. One of the big reasons Star Trek fans are so shat upon is because they refuse to accept anything that isn’t absolutely true to the characters or stories. I mean, I was reading an interview with the guy who plays Sulu and he talked about how he had to punch the buttons on his computer on the bridge just right so fans would not have a moderate to serious stroke.
Don’t you think this is taking it too far? But then I think, “Hey, Austin? What if they did this to Star Wars? What if, twenty years down the line someone remade the first Star Wars movie and changed a whole bunch and stuff? What would you think then? Why do you even have this inner voice that asks the stupidest hypothetical questions?” I honestly wouldn’t care. I mean, George Lucas has already remade the movie like three times anyway, so who gives a shit, right?
Point is, it seems this movie is kinda really its own little thing, almost completely independent of the other Star Trek stuff. It’s made for people who haven’t seen a single episode and for people who have translated the Bible into Klingon. There’s a balance that has to be struck. In the end, I really don’t think it will matter to most people. There is one thing that both Star Trek fans and people who have never heard want out of it: a good movie. And I think it looks like such. And it doesn’t hurt that it’s made by J.J. Abrams, who wrote and directed some kick-ass episodes of Lost.
But a warning before I end. I remember writing a similar post like this before the Indiana Jones movie came out last summer. I told people to calm the fuck down an not worry that they were changing stuff. And then I saw The Crystal Skull. And it just… wasn’t… Indy. The stuff they changed wasn’t that bad. But they delivered a movie that kinda stripped away what made Indiana Jones Indiana Jones. I’m sorry, I love aliens to death, but there is a time and a place for them and an Indiana Jones movie is neither the time nor the place. And no movie should EVER feature Shia LaBeouf swinging from trees (badly CGIed, I might add). At least Star Trek won’t feature that, right? RIGHT?!? It also can’t be any worse that that Wolverine movie. Jeeze. Co-starring Ryan Reynolds MY ASS.







